Mindgard vs Lakera
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Mindgard
Attacker-style reconnaissance and red teaming for AI apps and agents
Visit
|
Lakera
Prompt-injection guardrails and AI red teaming, now part of Check Poin...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.4 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | Community plan: $0/month, 10,000 requests a month, prompts up to 8,000 tokens, SaaS hosting with EU data residency, community support |
| Paid from | Quoted on request (sales-led, demo first) | Not published — Enterprise quoted on request (SaaS or self-hosted) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Maker | — | Check Point Software Technologies |
| Verdict | Mindgard's strength is research you can check: it has published disclosures of real flaws in products from Google, OpenAI and xAI, and that attack knowledge feeds a platform that maps a target's guardrails and tools befo... |
Lakera remains one of the best-known runtime guardrails for LLM applications: one API call screens prompts and outputs for prompt injection, jailbreaks and data leakage across more than 100 languages, and a free Communit... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.