Litmaps vs Semantic Scholar
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Litmaps
Discover related research with citation-graph mapping
Visit
|
Semantic Scholar
Free AI-powered academic search across 236M+ papers, all fields.
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Free tier | 3 maps with 200 papers each | Full access to all features for free |
| Paid from | $10/month (Researcher) | — |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | 100k+ researchers | 50m+ monthly visits |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Maker | University of Otago | Allen Institute for AI |
| Verdict | Litmaps maps citation networks so you can see how papers connect, spot the seminal ones, and catch new work as it publishes — handy for systematic reviews and expanding out from a handful of seed papers. The bigger 2026... |
Semantic Scholar, run by the nonprofit Allen Institute for AI, indexes over 236 million papers and ranks them by meaning rather than keyword overlap, which is where it beats Google Scholar's plain matching. The TLDR one-... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.