Langfuse vs Helicone

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Langfuse Open-source LLM observability, tracing and evals Visit Helicone Open-source LLM observability, now in maintenance mode Visit
RECATOOLS Score 8.4 / 10 7.6 / 10
Capability 8 7
Value for money 9 8
Ease of use 7 8
ASEAN readiness 7 6
API quality 9 8
Pricing Freemium Open Source
Free tier Self-host free under MIT (enterprise modules need a key); cloud Hobby plan free with 50k units/month, 30 days data access, 2 users Apache-2.0 open-source stack, free to self-host with Docker; maintenance-only updates. Hosted Hobby tier (10,000 requests/mo) is closed to new sign-ups
Paid from $29/month (Langfuse Cloud Core) Hosted Pro listed at $79/mo, but new sign-ups have been disabled since March 2026
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ ✓
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2023 2023
Maker ClickHouse, Inc. Mintlify (acquired March 2026)
Verdict

Langfuse covers the core of LLM observability: nested traces with cost and latency, prompt versioning, datasets, experiments and LLM-as-judge evaluators, through framework-agnostic SDKs and OpenTelemetry. The MIT core se...

Helicone was one of the lowest-friction ways to see what your LLM calls cost. Since Mintlify acquired it in March 2026 it has been in maintenance mode, with security fixes and new-model support but no new features, and n...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.