Juro vs Latch
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Juro
Contract lifecycle management with agentic AI review built in
Visit
|
Latch
In-house contract review inside Word — rebranded to Ivo in 2024
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.2 / 10 | 6.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Juro's bet is that most CLM tools make you leave the browser to actually work on a contract, and that's the friction it removes — drafting, redlining, approval routing and e-signing all happen in one workspace instead of... |
Ivo (what this directory still lists as Latch) reviews contracts inside Word itself rather than a separate portal: it checks incoming paper against rules an internal attorney team helped build, then hands back an issue l... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.