Flowith vs Manus AI

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Flowith Branching AI canvas with image, video, slides and the Agent Neo agent Visit Manus AI A general-purpose agent that returns finished work, now on Manus 2.0 Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.8 / 10 7 / 10
Capability 9.2 7
Value for money 7 6
Ease of use 6.5 7
ASEAN readiness 7 6
API quality 4 5
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier Starter: 300 one-time credits (no monthly refill) and limited models Free plan with daily refresh credits, capped at 1,500 credits a month and usable only on Manus 2.0 Lite
Paid from $19.90/month (Pro), or $17.91/month billed yearly at $214.92 $20/month (4,000 credits plus 300 daily refresh credits); 17% less billed annually
Has API ✗ ✗
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users 1M+ users (mid-2025) Viral 2M+ waitlist at launch; opened to all users May 2025
Founded 2023 2025
Maker Derek Nee (CEO), Yichen Wu (Co-founder & COO) Butterfly Effect Pte. Ltd.
Verdict

The canvas is the genuine strength: branching nodes keep long research or creative projects legible in a way a linear chat does not, and one subscription reaches 40+ image, video and text models. Credit pricing is public...

Manus is one of the few agents that regularly hands back a finished deliverable rather than a chat reply, and Manus 2.0 widens what it can make: automations triggered by events, always-on Cloud Computers, an editable vid...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.