Flowith vs Manus AI

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Flowith Infinite-canvas AI workspace where Agent Neo chains 1,000+ steps. Visit Manus AI Autonomous general-purpose AI agent Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.8 / 10 7 / 10
Capability 9.2 7
Value for money 7 6
Ease of use 6.5 7
ASEAN readiness 7 6
API quality 4 5
Pricing Freemium Paid
Free tier Free tier: ~300–1,000 one-time credits, up to 3 canvases, basic models
Paid from Pro from ~$17.91/mo (billed annually) to $19.90/mo; Infinite ~$499.90/mo Free (300 credits); Standard $20/mo; Customizable $40/mo; Extended $200/mo
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users 1M+ users (mid-2025) Viral 2M+ waitlist at launch; opened to all users May 2025
Founded 2023 2024
Maker Derek Nee (CEO), Yichen Wu (Co-founder & COO)
Verdict

Agent Neo is the real draw: a 10M-token context window and a claimed lead on the GAIA agent benchmark (Flowith's own reporting, not an independently verified leaderboard entry) set it apart from single-shot chat tools. T...

Manus does what few agents actually deliver: hand it a research brief, a data set or a small build and it frequently comes back with the finished artifact, not a chat answer. The 1.6 models, Web App Builder and messaging...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.