Exa vs Luzmo

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Exa Web search and retrieval API built for AI agents and apps Visit Luzmo Embed white-label dashboards and conversational AI analytics into your... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.7 / 10 7.8 / 10
Capability 8 8
Value for money 7 7.5
Ease of use 8 8.2
ASEAN readiness 6 6.5
API quality 8 8.5
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier 20,000 search requests per month on the free plan; startup and education grants of $1,000 in free API credits also available Free trial via app.luzmo.com/signup; no permanent free tier for production use
Paid from API search billed at $7 per 1,000 requests (as of March 2026 pricing update) Starter from ~€495/mo (billed annually); Premium ~€1,995/mo; Enterprise custom
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users 240+ SaaS company customers (Series A, Jan 2023); ~45-50 employees (2026)
Founded 2021 2015
Maker Luzmo NV (independent; no parent acquisition confirmed as of 2026)
Verdict

Exa is a credible, fast-moving entrant in the agent-search space, with a clean API, MCP support and strong investor backing as of 2026. It competes directly with Parallel and Tavily on freshness and structured retrieval...

Luzmo excels in its core mission: helping SaaS product teams ship embedded, white-labeled analytics fast. Its drag-and-drop builder, MAU-based pricing, robust multi-tenancy, and multi-language SDK support (Node.js, Pytho...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.