Elicit vs Consensus
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Elicit
AI literature search, extraction and systematic reviews with sentence-...
Visit
|
Consensus
AI search engine that shows what the research says
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.6 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Basic: unlimited search of 138M+ papers, unlimited summaries and full-text paper chat, Zotero import; limited Research Agent and Reports usage | Basic paper search, 10 Pro messages and up to 3 Deep reviews a month |
| Paid from | From $11/month (academic Plus billed yearly, or $19 monthly); industry Pro $49/month yearly | Pro $12/mo billed annually ($20 monthly); Deep $45/mo annually ($65 monthly) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | 200k+ researchers | 500k+ users |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Maker | Andreas Stuhlmuller | Eric Olson, Christian Salem |
| Verdict | Elicit is the most complete AI tool for structured literature work: search, screening, extraction tables and cited reports in one place, with every claim tied to a source sentence. Published studies support it as a secon... |
Consensus answers research questions from academic literature rather than the open web: a cited synthesis, natural-language filters for population, design and time frame, and a Consensus Meter showing how far studies agr... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.