Cursor Composer vs Google Antigravity
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Cursor Composer
Cursor's multi-file agent mode, now on the Composer 2.5 model
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8.1 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2024 | — |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Composer plans and executes changes across a codebase from one instruction — scaffolding a feature, renaming a pattern across files, updating an API contract — with a diff review step before anything lands. Cursor's own... |
Antigravity is Google's answer to Cursor and Windsurf, built around Gemini 3 and a Manager view that lets several coding agents run at once across a workspace. The Browser Subagent — a real Chrome instance the agent driv... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.