Cassidy AI vs Glean
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Cassidy AI
AI assistants grounded in your company knowledge base
Visit
|
Glean
Enterprise search and AI assistant for work
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.7 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Enterprise |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | — | Enterprise custom; reported ~$50-75/user/month, ~100-seat minimum |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | $300M ARR as of May 2026 (customer count not officially disclosed |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Cassidy's differentiator is the knowledge base sitting under everything. It syncs Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Notion, and Confluence in near real time, so assistants answer from current company data instead of a... |
Glean is a leading enterprise work-AI platform: it indexes a company's SaaS apps (email, docs, tickets, chat, code) into a permissions-aware search and assistant, with an agent-building layer on top. Its strengths are co... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.