Tabnine vs Amazon Q Developer

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Tabnine Private, self-hostable AI coding assistant, now part of Tricentis Visit Amazon Q Developer AWS's AI coding assistant, closed to new users and sunsetting in 2027 Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.4 / 10 6.5 / 10
Capability 7 7
Value for money 7 8
Ease of use 7.5 7
ASEAN readiness 7 7
API quality 6.5 8
Pricing Enterprise Subscription
Free tier — Closed to new users since 15 May 2026; existing Builder ID users keep 50 agentic requests/mo and 1,000 lines/mo of Java upgrades
Paid from $39/user/month, annual subscription (last published Sep 2026); now quoted by Tricentis sales Pro $19/user/mo, existing subscriptions only; new sign-ups closed 15 May 2026, EOS 30 Apr 2027
Has API ✗ ✓
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✗ ✗
Users 1m+ developers —
Founded 2018 2024
Maker Tricentis Amazon (Amazon Web Services, Inc.)
Verdict

Tabnine's case is deployment control: air-gapped, VPC or on-premises installation, no retention of customer code, models trained on permissively licensed code, and a Context Engine that grounds agents in an organisation'...

Amazon Q Developer is no longer something to adopt: AWS closed it to new sign-ups in May 2026 and ends the IDE plugins and paid subscriptions on 30 April 2027, steering developers to Kiro, where the newest coding models...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.