STORM (Stanford) vs FutureHouse
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
|
|
FutureHouse
Eric-Schmidt-backed nonprofit building AI agents to automate scientifi...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | — | |
| Value for money | — | |
| Ease of use | — | |
| ASEAN readiness | — | |
| API quality | — | |
| Pricing | Open Source | Freemium |
| Free tier | Free and open source (MIT); hosted research preview is free with sign-in | Free public web platform and agents (Crow, Falcon, Owl, Robin) plus a free API tier for researchers. |
| Paid from | — | Not published — the founding Kosmos subscription was withdrawn in May 2026 |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Maker | Stanford University (Stanford OVAL) | Sam Rodriques, Andrew White |
| Verdict | STORM is a clear example of structure-first long-form generation: it surveys perspectives, simulates source-grounded interviews and outlines before drafting, which in Stanford's evaluation produced better-organised and b... |
What this is for: Automating literature review, hypothesis generation and multi-step scientific reasoning with citation-grounded AI agents. Who this is for: Academic researchers and scientists in biology, chemistry and... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.