Semantic Scholar vs Scite
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Semantic Scholar
Free AI-powered academic search across 236M+ papers, all fields.
Visit
|
Scite
Citation index that flags support vs. contradiction, not just count
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Free tier | Full access to all features for free | Limited citation lookups and searches |
| Paid from | — | $20/month (Premium) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | 50m+ monthly visits | 15000+ institutions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Maker | Allen Institute for AI | Josh Nicholson, Domenic Rosati |
| Verdict | Semantic Scholar, run by the nonprofit Allen Institute for AI, indexes over 236 million papers and ranks them by meaning rather than keyword overlap, which is where it beats Google Scholar's plain matching. The TLDR one-... |
Scite's core idea — classifying whether a citing paper actually supports, contradicts, or just name-checks a claim — is still the sharpest tool in academic citation analysis, and Smart Citations make it fast to see how w... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.