Semantic Scholar vs Scite
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Semantic Scholar
Free AI-assisted academic search across 200M+ papers, from Ai2
Visit
|
Scite
Shows whether later research supported or contradicted a paper
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Free | Subscription |
| Free tier | Search, paper pages, TLDRs (CS/biomed), Semantic Reader, alerts, feeds and the API are free; an API key gives 1 request/sec | 7-day free trial of Basic or Pro; no lasting free plan |
| Paid from | — | $12/month (Basic, billed yearly) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 50m+ monthly visits | 15000+ institutions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Maker | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Research Solutions, Inc. |
| Verdict | Semantic Scholar remains one of the best free tools for finding and tracing academic literature, with excellent citation data and a generous free API that other research tools build on. Its AI features are narrower than... |
Scite's Smart Citations remain the quickest way to see whether a finding has held up: the citing sentence and its classification sit next to the count, and the Assistant links each answer back to that evidence. The MCP s... |
| Full review → | Directory listing → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.