Sema4.ai vs Beam AI vs Stack AI vs Relevance AI

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Sema4.ai Governed enterprise AI agents, deployed in your own cloud Visit Beam AI Autonomous agents for enterprise back-office processes Visit Stack AI No-code enterprise AI agents, now an Asana company Visit Relevance AI No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent 'teams' Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.9 / 10 5.6 / 10 7 / 10 7.3 / 10
Capability 7 6 7 7.5
Value for money 6 5 6.5 7
Ease of use 6 5 7.5 6.5
ASEAN readiness 6 5 6 6
API quality 6 5 6.5 7
Pricing Paid Paid Freemium Freemium
Free tier
Paid from
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users
Founded
Maker
Verdict

Sema4.ai targets the unglamorous, high-value end of AI agents: invoice reconciliation, regulatory checks, financial ops, work where a wrong answer is expensive. It leans on the Robocorp RPA platform it absorbed in 2024,...

Beam AI is built for the enterprise operations leader with a well-documented, repetitive process and budget to automate it, not for someone kicking tires on a weekend. The pitch is autonomous agents that run back-office...

Stack AI aims at a specific buyer: the compliance-minded enterprise that wants custom AI agents but won't touch a tool lacking SOC 2 Type II, a HIPAA BAA, and audit logs on every input and output. The drag-and-drop build...

Relevance AI's abstraction is the draw: build a single agent, give it tools and workflows, then chain several into a "team" that runs a whole process. It started life as a vector/data platform and pivoted into agents, an...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.