Open Knowledge Maps vs Litmaps
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Open Knowledge Maps
Free visual maps clustering the top 100 papers on any topic
Visit
|
Litmaps
Discover related research with citation-graph mapping
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Free tier | Full access free, no account required | 3 maps with 200 papers each |
| Paid from | — | $10/month (Researcher) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 500k+ researchers | 100k+ researchers |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Maker | Peter Kraker | University of Otago |
| Verdict | Open Knowledge Maps turns a search query into an interactive map that clusters the top 100 documents from PubMed or BASE into visual topic groups — a fast, free way to get oriented in an unfamiliar field. It's a register... |
Litmaps maps citation networks so you can see how papers connect, spot the seminal ones, and catch new work as it publishes — handy for systematic reviews and expanding out from a handful of seed papers. The bigger 2026... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.