Microsoft MDASH vs DryRun Security
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Microsoft MDASH
Microsoft's multi-model AI agents for finding code vulnerabilities
Visit
|
DryRun Security
AI-native contextual security for every pull request — catch exploitab...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7 / 10 | 8.1 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Contact | Enterprise |
| Free tier | None. Private/expanded preview for eligible organisations via sign-up or Microsoft account team; scans use the customer's own Azure model deployments | Free trial and free security assessment |
| Paid from | Not published, models run in your own Azure Foundry, billed at Azure $ rates | Seat-based contracts; AWS Marketplace lists $85,000 a year for 100 developer seats |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | Customers ran 250,000+ code reviews/month as of early 2025; customer count undisclosed |
| Founded | 2026 | 2023 |
| Maker | Microsoft | James Wickett (CEO) and Ken Johnson (CTO) |
| Verdict | MDASH is a serious demonstration of AI agents finding real vulnerabilities, credited with 16 Patch Tuesday fixes and strong CyberGym results, and it fits naturally into Microsoft Defender and developer pipelines. But it... |
DryRun Security's pitch — trace actual data flow instead of matching regex patterns — is backed so far by its own testing: its 2025 SAST Accuracy Report says it caught 23 of 26 seeded vulnerabilities across four intentio... |
| Full review → | Directory listing → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.