LangWatch vs OpenLLMetry
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
LangWatch
OpenTelemetry-native LLMOps for tracing, evals and agent simulation
Visit
|
OpenLLMetry
Open-source OpenTelemetry tracing for LLM apps
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Open Source |
| Free tier | Developer: free forever, 50k events/mo, 14-day data, 2 users, 3 scenarios/simulations/custom evals. Self-hosting free under Apache 2.0 | OpenLLMetry is free and open source (Apache-2.0); Traceloop's hosted free tier covers up to 50K spans a month with 24-hour retention |
| Paid from | Growth €29 (US$34) per core seat/mo + €5 per 100k events beyond 200k | — |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Maker | Independent (LangWatch Reasoning Engine B.V.) | ServiceNow |
| Verdict | LangWatch has become a genuinely open-source LLMOps platform, with strong agent simulation, evaluation and gateway features and generous self-hosting terms. Its pricing advantage over rivals is argued in its own blog rat... |
OpenLLMetry is the sensible default if you already run OpenTelemetry: a pip install and one init line, and your LLM calls show up as standard spans in the backend you already use. Coverage of providers, vector databases... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.