Irregular vs Mindgard
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Irregular
The frontier-AI security lab whose evaluations appear in model system...
Visit
|
Mindgard
AI red-teaming platform
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.4 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Free tier | — | Not offered — sold by demo |
| Paid from | — | Not published — sales-led ("Book a Demo") |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | A genuinely specialised outfit doing work that very few organisations can do at all, and the proof is that its findings show up in the published safety documentation of the largest labs rather than in its own marketing.... |
Mindgard is a specialist automated AI red-teaming and DAST-for-AI platform, spun out of Lancaster University, that tests LLMs, agents, and multimodal models against thousands of attack scenarios (prompt injection, jailbr... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.