Iris.ai vs Scite
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Iris.ai
AI research assistant for scientists and analysts
Visit
|
Scite
Citation index that flags support vs. contradiction, not just count
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.4 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Free tier | Free trial for researchers | Limited citation lookups and searches |
| Paid from | Enterprise custom pricing | $20/month (Premium) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | 500+ enterprise R&D teams | 15000+ institutions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Maker | Anita Schjoll Brede | Josh Nicholson, Domenic Rosati |
| Verdict | Iris.ai has grown from a scientific-search engine into an enterprise agentic-RAG platform: RSpace is the researcher workspace (topic maps, concept extraction, filtering millions of papers and patents), with Neuralith and... |
Scite's core idea — classifying whether a citing paper actually supports, contradicts, or just name-checks a claim — is still the sharpest tool in academic citation analysis, and Smart Citations make it fast to see how w... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.