Inngest vs Trigger.dev

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

	Inngest Durable execution for backend and AI workflows, no queues to run. Visit	Trigger.dev Code-first background jobs and AI workflows, no timeouts Visit
RECATOOLS Score	7.8 / 10	7.9 / 10
Capability	7.5	7.5
Value for money	7.5	7.5
Ease of use	7.5	7.5
ASEAN readiness	6.5	6.5
API quality	8	8
Pricing	Freemium	Freemium
Free tier	—	—
Paid from	—	—
Has API	✓	✓
Open source	✓	✓
Free to use	✓	✓
Users	—	—
Founded	—	—
Maker	—	—
Verdict	Inngest solves a genuinely unglamorous problem well: keeping long-running, multi-step jobs and agent workflows alive through crashes, retries and deploys without you standing up a queue and a state store yourself. Develo...	Trigger.dev solves the boring-but-critical problem underneath most AI features: something has to run a multi-minute agent loop or a batch job reliably, with retries and observability, without a serverless function timing...
	Full review →	Full review →

← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.