Hugging Face vs Lilac

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Hugging Face The open AI hub for models, datasets and demos, being acquired by NVID... Visit Lilac Archived open-source dataset curation tool, acquired by Databricks Visit
RECATOOLS Score 8.5 / 10 6.5 / 10
Capability — 7
Value for money — 7
Ease of use — 6
ASEAN readiness — 5
API quality — 6
Pricing Freemium Open Source
Free tier Free account: public models/datasets, 100GB private storage, 5 min/day ZeroGPU, $0.10/mo Inference Providers credits, free CPU Basic Spaces Free: archived Apache-2.0 code on GitHub (databricks/lilac) and PyPI (0.3.9). The hosted Garden service and website are gone; nothing is for sale
Paid from PRO $9/mo; Team $20/user/mo; Enterprise from $50/user/mo —
Has API ✓ ✗
Open source ✓ ✓
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users ~13M monthly active users; 50,000+ organizations —
Founded 2016 2023
Maker Independent (Hugging Face, Inc.; NVIDIA acquisition pending) Databricks (acquired 2024)
Verdict

Hugging Face remains indispensable for anyone working with open AI models: the default place to find, share and test models and datasets, with simple paid plans and pay-as-you-go inference with no markup on partner provi...

Lilac made large text datasets explorable: it clustered and auto-titled documents, ran semantic and keyword search, and flagged PII and near-duplicates through a local UI and Python API. Databricks acquired it in March 2...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.