ExaWizards exaBase vs Relevance AI
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
|
|
Relevance AI
No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent 'teams'
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.4 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | 2-week free trial (basic fee and usage waived up to a cap); exaBase Empower up to 6-month free trial | — |
| Paid from | From ¥900/user/month + ¥27/1,000 chars (exaBase Generative AI); Studio pricing on request | — |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) | — |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Maker | ExaWizards Inc. (TSE: 4259) | — |
| Verdict | exaBase earned Japan's #1 ranking in the Deloitte Tohmatsu MIC FY2023 study across seven categories, and July 2026 brought a rebrand that matches the ambition: exaBase 生成AI is now simply exaBase AI, with autonomous age... |
Relevance AI's abstraction is the draw: build a single agent, give it tools and workflows, then chain several into a "team" that runs a whole process. It started life as a vector/data platform and pivoted into agents, an... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.