Exabeam vs Hunters vs Microsoft Security Copilot vs Splunk AI Assist

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

	Exabeam UEBA-first SIEM that auto-builds the incident timeline Visit	Hunters Next-gen SIEM with built-in detection and correlation. Visit	Microsoft Security Copilot GenAI copilot for SOC analysts, now bundled into Microsoft 365 E5 Visit	Splunk AI Assist Cisco's SIEM adds genAI: SPL query generation and alert triage Visit
RECATOOLS Score	7.4 / 10	7.2 / 10	7.1 / 10	7.5 / 10
Capability	8	8	8	8.5
Value for money	6	6	5	5.5
Ease of use	5	6	6	6
ASEAN readiness	6	5	7	6.5
API quality	7	6	7	8
Pricing	Paid	Paid	Enterprise	Enterprise
Free tier	—	—	—	—
Paid from	—	—	—	—
Has API	✗	✗	✓	✓
Open source	✗	✗	✗	✗
Free to use	✗	✗	✗	✗
Users	—	—	—	—
Founded	—	—	2023	2024
Maker	—	—	—	—
Verdict	Exabeam's edge has always been behavior analytics and its Smart Timelines, which stitch scattered log events into one readable incident story so an analyst isn't manually piecing together who did what. The 2024 all-stock...	Hunters sells the idea that a small security team shouldn't have to write all its own detection logic. The platform ships out-of-the-box detection content and layers agentic AI, ML, and graph-based correlation on top to...	Security Copilot earns its keep inside a Microsoft-heavy stack: it reads Defender, Sentinel, Intune and Entra signals natively, more integration depth than most bolt-on AI security tools manage. Reviewers consistently fl...	Splunk's AI Assistant does one job well: it turns a plain-English question into working SPL, the query language that's historically been Splunk's steepest learning curve. For a SOC analyst who knows what they want to fin...
	Full review →	Full review →	Full review →	Full review →

← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.