Cursor vs Trae

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Cursor AI code editor and coding agents, now sold inside The X Subscription Visit Trae ByteDance's AI IDE and agent, with a free plan and higher paid prices... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 8.6 / 10 7.8 / 10
Capability 9 8
Value for money 7 9
Ease of use 9 8
ASEAN readiness 6 7
API quality 3 n/a
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier Free plan: limited agent and Chat requests and a starter allowance for Cursor's coding agents, no card listed Free plan: Auto mode only, limited usage allowance, 5,000 autocompletions/month and 2 concurrent cloud tasks; SOLO mode requires a paid plan
Paid from $8/month (Plus, Grok models only), Premium $30, Super $100, Ultra $200 Pro $20/mo ($200/yr); Lite $8/mo in select markets incl. MY, ID, TH, VN, PH
Has API ✗ ✗
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users 1m+ developers —
Founded 2023 2025
Maker SpaceX ByteDance
Verdict

Cursor remains one of the strongest AI editors: agents that work across a whole codebase, cloud agents and automations, and Bugbot reviews, with Grok and Composer models included in a weekly allowance. The October 2026 m...

Trae is a polished agentic IDE with a broad model picker and genuine ASEAN fit — a Singapore operator, regional data storage, local payment methods and a cheaper Lite plan in several Southeast Asian markets. It is no lon...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.