Cursor vs Magic.dev
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Cursor
AI code editor and coding agents, now sold inside The X Subscription
Visit
|
Magic.dev
Coding-model research lab; nothing released yet
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8.6 / 10 | 5.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Unknown |
| Free tier | Free plan: limited agent and Chat requests and a starter allowance for Cursor's coding agents, no card listed | — |
| Paid from | $8/month (Plus, Grok models only), Premium $30, Super $100, Ultra $200 | No product on sale, no price, API or waitlist published (Oct 2026) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 1m+ developers | — |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Maker | SpaceX | — |
| Verdict | Cursor remains one of the strongest AI editors: agents that work across a whole codebase, cloud agents and automations, and Bugbot reviews, with Grok and Composer models included in a weekly allowance. The October 2026 m... |
Magic pursues ultra-long context, with LTM-2-mini trained on up to 100 million tokens, and by its own account compute-efficient pretraining, aimed at automating software engineering. The research write-ups are substantiv... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.