Consensus vs Undermind
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Consensus
AI search engine that shows what the science actually says
Visit
|
Undermind
Deep AI literature search that trades speed for near-total recall
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.3 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Free tier | 20 searches per day with basic features | Free demo available |
| Paid from | Pro $15/mo ($10/mo annual); Deep tier for power users/researchers | $9 per summary |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 500k+ users | 10k+ researchers |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Maker | Eric Olson, Christian Salem | Ian Fischer |
| Verdict | Consensus answers research questions by pulling from peer-reviewed literature rather than the open web: type a question, get a synthesized answer with citations, a Consensus Meter showing what share of studies actually a... |
Undermind, a YC-backed startup from two MIT physics PhDs, runs successive adaptive searches over the scientific literature instead of one-shot keyword retrieval, reading full texts and chasing citation trails to approach... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.