Consensus vs Elicit vs Perplexity AI vs Undermind

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Consensus AI search engine that shows what the science actually says Visit Elicit AI research assistant for academic literature reviews Visit Perplexity AI The answer engine that cites its sources on every live web query Visit Undermind Deep AI literature search that trades speed for near-total recall Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.3 / 10 7.6 / 10 8.4 / 10 7 / 10
Capability 7 8 8 8
Value for money 7 7 8 6
Ease of use 8 8 9 7
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6 6
API quality 4 5 7 3
Pricing Freemium Freemium Freemium Paid
Free tier 20 searches per day with basic features Basic: unlimited search + 2 automated reports/month; ~125-200M-paper corpus Unlimited basic searches with standard model Free demo available
Paid from Pro $15/mo ($10/mo annual); Deep tier for power users/researchers Plus $12/mo; Pro $49/mo; Team $79/mo $20/month (Pro); $200/month (Max, launched July 2025) $9 per summary
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users 500k+ users 200k+ researchers 30M+ standalone monthly active users (100M+ across all products, 2026) 10k+ researchers
Founded 2022 2018 2022 2023
Maker Eric Olson, Christian Salem Ought (non-profit) Aravind Srinivas, Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, Andy Konwinski Ian Fischer
Verdict

Consensus answers research questions by pulling from peer-reviewed literature rather than the open web: type a question, get a synthesized answer with citations, a Consensus Meter showing what share of studies actually a...

Elicit owns the literature-review niche: it searches 138 million papers, pulls methods, sample sizes and findings into structured comparison tables, and links every extraction back to source text, which makes verificatio...

Perplexity remains the strongest citation-first answer engine: every query triggers a live web search and each sentence links to its sources, which makes verification fast in a way plain chatbots can't match. The free ti...

Undermind, a YC-backed startup from two MIT physics PhDs, runs successive adaptive searches over the scientific literature instead of one-shot keyword retrieval, reading full texts and chasing citation trails to approach...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.