Crush vs Warp
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
|
|
Warp
Open-source, agentic dev environment built from the terminal
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Open Source | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | Free — 75 AI credits/month (150/month for the first two months) |
| Paid from | — | Build $20/month (1,500 credits, BYOK); Business $50/month (SSO, ZDR, 50 seats) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | — | — |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Crush carries Charm's design pedigree (Bubble Tea, Gum, Glow) into agentic coding, and it shows — reviewers consistently call it the best-looking TUI in the category. LSP integration means it reasons about actual functio... |
Warp's big move this year was going open source — the client shipped on GitHub in April 2026 under a mixed MIT/AGPLv3 license, and the account-login requirement that used to bug privacy-minded developers is gone. That's... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.