Cassidy AI vs ExaWizards exaBase
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Cassidy AI
AI assistants grounded in your company knowledge base
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.7 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | 2-week free trial (basic fee and usage waived up to a cap); exaBase Empower up to 6-month free trial |
| Paid from | — | From ¥900/user/month + ¥27/1,000 chars (exaBase Generative AI); Studio pricing on request |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) |
| Founded | — | 2016 |
| Maker | — | ExaWizards Inc. (TSE: 4259) |
| Verdict | Cassidy's differentiator is the knowledge base sitting under everything. It syncs Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Notion, and Confluence in near real time, so assistants answer from current company data instead of a... |
exaBase earned Japan's #1 ranking in the Deloitte Tohmatsu MIC FY2023 study across seven categories, and July 2026 brought a rebrand that matches the ambition: exaBase 生成AI is now simply exaBase AI, with autonomous age... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.