Amazon Q Developer vs Tabnine
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Amazon Q Developer
AWS's AI coding assistant, closed to new users and sunsetting in 2027
Visit
|
Tabnine
Private, self-hostable AI coding assistant, now part of Tricentis
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.5 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Subscription | Enterprise |
| Free tier | Closed to new users since 15 May 2026; existing Builder ID users keep 50 agentic requests/mo and 1,000 lines/mo of Java upgrades | — |
| Paid from | Pro $19/user/mo, existing subscriptions only; new sign-ups closed 15 May 2026, EOS 30 Apr 2027 | $39/user/month, annual subscription (last published Sep 2026); now quoted by Tricentis sales |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 1m+ developers |
| Founded | 2024 | 2018 |
| Maker | Amazon (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) | Tricentis |
| Verdict | Amazon Q Developer is no longer something to adopt: AWS closed it to new sign-ups in May 2026 and ends the IDE plugins and paid subscriptions on 30 April 2027, steering developers to Kiro, where the newest coding models... |
Tabnine's case is deployment control: air-gapped, VPC or on-premises installation, no retention of customer code, models trained on permissively licensed code, and a Context Engine that grounds agents in an organisation'... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.