Jet-Lag Calculator
Jet-lag calculator: enter the hours of clock difference and whether the destination is ahead or behind, and see how many days the body clock takes to catch up advancing and delaying, at the published flight averages. Runs in your browser.
Jet-Lag Calculator
Use the difference on your travel dates. Half hours are allowed. Anything over 12 is fine: the tool reduces it to a 24-hour day.
How to Use the Jet-Lag Calculator
Say which way the clock moves
Choose whether the destination clock is ahead of home or behind it.
Enter the clock difference
Use hours on your travel dates, half hours included. Daylight saving at the destination can move it by an hour.
Read both ways round
See the days to advance and the days to delay at the published averages, and which is shorter.
Check the large-shift flag
For advances of 8 to 12 hours the tool says why the averages may not describe what a body does.
Two Ways Round a Clock Difference
The body keeps its own clock, and on average it runs slightly longer than a day: Duffy and colleagues measured 24.15 hours across 157 people in 2011, with some individuals below 24. Fly to a destination whose clock is ahead and the body has to advance; fly to one behind and it has to delay. Eastman and Burgess, in a 2009 review, put the easier time going west down “at least in part” to that slightly long period.
The day counts here come from early estimates on real flights, reviewed by Aschoff’s group in 1975: about 57 minutes a day advancing and 92 minutes a day delaying, which Eastman and Burgess work through as 1 hour and 1.5 hours a day. The familiar “a day per time zone” restates those averages. They are not constants: with bright light timed in the lab, the same paper reports 1.6 hours a day advancing and 2.4 hours delaying. So every number this tool prints is the average applied to your clock difference, not a forecast for your body.
A clock difference can be closed either way round, which is why the tool shows both. At the averages, advancing and delaying take equal time at a 9.6-hour advance, and the observations agree that large eastward shifts are unsettled: Gundel and Wegmann put the critical advance at +7 to +10 hours, and in a Tokyo team’s study seven of eight men delayed after an 11-hour eastward flight to New York. Light is the mechanism behind both: Khalsa and colleagues found light before the body’s temperature low point delayed the clock and light after it advanced it. The tool shows where a textbook low point falls on the destination clock, and stops there. It gives no medical advice. Everything is computed in your browser.
The body adjusts to a clock difference, not to a flight — and for a big enough eastward jump, the long way round can be the shorter one.
Why the body clock finds east harder, and when it goes the long way
On average the human body clock runs a little over 24 hours: 24.15 h, or 24 h 9 min, in 157 people measured by Duffy et al. (2011).
Flying east needs the clock to advance; flying west needs it to delay (Eastman & Burgess 2009).
That longer-than-24-hour period explains the east–west difference at least in part, in Eastman & Burgess’s words.
Early flight estimates, reviewed by Aschoff’s group in 1975: about 57 minutes a day advancing and 92 minutes a day delaying.
With bright light timed in the lab, a 12-hour shift moved at 1.6 h a day advancing and 2.4 h a day delaying over the first four days (Eastman & Burgess 2009).
Light centred before the body’s temperature low point delayed the clock; centred after it, advanced it (Khalsa et al. 2003, 21 subjects).
Gundel & Wegmann (1989) estimated the critical advance shift at +7 to +10 hours, from a flight experiment and simulations.
After an 11-hour eastward flight to New York, seven of eight men in a Tokyo team’s study re-entrained by delaying (Takahashi et al. 2001).
At the averages, delaying becomes the shorter way at a 9.6-hour advance, which this tool computes from the two rates.
The unit is hours of clock difference, not zones: Singapore to Delhi is 2.5 hours, and daylight saving at the destination moves many routes by an hour across the year.
Frequently Asked Questions
- You enter the clock difference in hours and whether the destination clock is ahead or behind. The tool reduces that to a 24-hour day and shows how many days the body clock takes to close the gap by advancing and by delaying, at the published flight averages of about 1 hour a day advancing and 1.5 hours a day delaying. The headline is the shorter of the two.
- Flying east needs the body clock to advance and flying west needs it to delay. Eastman and Burgess (2009) explain the asymmetry “at least in part” by the clock’s average period being slightly longer than 24 hours: Duffy et al. (2011) measured an average of 24.15 hours in 157 people, with some individuals below 24.
- From early estimates on real flights, reviewed by Aschoff’s group in 1975: the clock delayed about 92 minutes a day after westward flights and advanced about 57 minutes a day after eastward ones. Eastman and Burgess (2009) work these through as 1.5 hours a day and 1 hour a day, and say they are “altered by the actual pattern of light and dark”. Every day count here is at those published averages, not a prediction for any one person.
- Because a clock difference can be closed either way round. A destination 8 hours ahead can be reached by advancing 8 hours or by delaying 16. At the published averages the two take the same time at a 9.6-hour advance, so for larger advances delaying is the shorter way. That is also why 12 hours east and 12 hours west give the same answer: they are the same clock change.
- The body does not always advance. Eastman and Burgess (2009) write that antidromic re-entrainment, adjusting by delaying, “is common following eastward travel, especially when 8 or more time zones are crossed”. Gundel and Wegmann (1989) estimated the critical advance at +7 to +10 hours, and seven of eight men in a Tokyo team’s study delayed after an 11-hour eastward flight to New York (Takahashi et al. 2001). The tool flags advances of 8 to 12 hours for this reason; the samples are small, so it does not predict which way a given body goes.
- The body adjusts to the clock it finds on arrival, so the unit is the difference in hours. Some zones are half an hour off (Singapore to Delhi is 2.5 hours), and daylight saving at the destination moves many routes by an hour: Singapore to London is 8 hours in January and 7 in July. Check the difference for your travel dates, because Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong do not change their clocks while many destinations do.
- In a study of 21 people, Khalsa et al. (2003) found that bright light centred before the body’s temperature low point delayed the clock and light centred after it advanced it. The tool shows where a textbook low point of 04:00 home time falls on the destination clock. Individual low points vary, so this describes the mechanism rather than giving a schedule.
- No. It is the average time for the body clock to shift. In 64,847 trips by Oura Ring users starting in North America and Europe, Willoughby et al. (2025) found sleep duration back within about 12 minutes of baseline after about 2 days, while sleep timing had often not returned to baseline by day 15, the end of the study window. That measures sleep timing, not the body clock directly, and the trips did not start in Asia.
- No. It applies published averages to a clock difference and describes what studies found. It gives no advice on medicines, supplements or fitness to travel. Anyone with a sleep disorder or a health condition should talk to a doctor.
- Yes, with no account or usage limit. It runs entirely in your browser and sends nothing you enter anywhere.
Method & sources
How it computes
Eastman CI, Burgess HJ. How to travel the world without jet lag. Sleep Med Clin 2009;4(2):241-55 — phase advance 1 h/day and delay 1.5 h/day, the classic flight averages of Aschoff et al. (Chronobiologia 1975). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2829880/
What this tool implements
- Input is hours of clock difference (half hours allowed), reduced modulo 24; the day count is shown both ways round — advance hours ÷ 1 h/day and delay hours ÷ 1.5 h/day — and the headline is the shorter, labelled as the published average, not a prediction for a person.
- Advances of 8 to 12 h are flagged as the band where antidromic re-entrainment (adjusting by delaying) has been observed; at the averages the two ways cross at a 9.6 h advance.
- Light is described by its phase response (before the temperature low point delays, after it advances), using the textbook 04:00 low point; no schedule, and no medication or supplement advice.
Sources
- Eastman CI, Burgess HJ. How to travel the world without jet lag. Sleep Med Clin 2009;4(2):241-55 — "phase delays 92 min/day after westward flights and phase advances 57 min/day after eastward flights" (Aschoff et al. 1975); "Antidromic re-entrainment is common following eastward travel, especially when 8 or more time zones are crossed". https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2829880/
- Duffy et al. PNAS 2011;108 Suppl 3:15602-8 — average intrinsic period 24.15 h in 157 people. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3176605/
- Khalsa et al. J Physiol 2003;549:945-52 — light centred before the core body temperature minimum delayed the clock, after it advanced it (21 subjects). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12717008/
- Gundel & Wegmann. Chronobiol Int 1989;6:147-56 — critical advance shifts estimated at +7 to +10 h. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2743467/
- Takahashi et al. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;55:275-6 — 11-h eastward flight to New York: "Seven of eight subjects showed antidromic re-entrainment". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11422873/
- Willoughby, Vallat, Ong & Chee. SLEEP 2025;48(7):zsaf077 — 64,847 trips by Oura Ring users from North America and Europe; sleep duration near baseline after about 2 days, sleep timing often not back by day 15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40127035/
Pick up where you left off
Stored only in this browser — never sent to our servers.