Scite vs Consensus
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Scite
Citation index that flags support vs. contradiction, not just count
Visit
|
Consensus
AI search engine that shows what the science actually says
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.8 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Limited citation lookups and searches | 20 searches per day with basic features |
| Paid from | $20/month (Premium) | Pro $15/mo ($10/mo annual); Deep tier for power users/researchers |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | 15000+ institutions | 500k+ users |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Maker | Josh Nicholson, Domenic Rosati | Eric Olson, Christian Salem |
| Verdict | Scite's core idea — classifying whether a citing paper actually supports, contradicts, or just name-checks a claim — is still the sharpest tool in academic citation analysis, and Smart Citations make it fast to see how w... |
Consensus answers research questions by pulling from peer-reviewed literature rather than the open web: type a question, get a synthesized answer with citations, a Consensus Meter showing what share of studies actually a... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.