Giskard vs DeepEval vs Promptfoo

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Giskard Open-source LLM red teaming, now with an EU guardrail layer. Visit DeepEval Pytest-style unit testing for LLM outputs, 50+ metrics, Apache 2.0 Visit Promptfoo MIT-licensed LLM eval and red-teaming CLI, now owned by OpenAI Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.8 / 10 8 / 10 8.1 / 10
Capability 8.5 8 8
Value for money 8.8 9 8.5
Ease of use 6.5 8 7.5
ASEAN readiness 5.5 6.5 6.5
API quality 7.5 7.5 8
Pricing Freemium Open Source Freemium
Free tier Full open-source Python library (Apache 2.0), free forever, no usage caps
Paid from Enterprise Hub: custom pricing (contact sales); no public per-seat rate
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users Thousands of developers (OSS); enterprise clients incl. AXA, BNP Paribas, Michelin
Founded 2021
Maker Giskard AI (independent)
Verdict

Giskard's free, Apache 2.0 scanner (5,200+ GitHub stars) covers 50+ adversarial attack types mapped to OWASP, MITRE ATLAS and NIST — genuinely rare generosity in AI security tooling, where most competitors gate everythin...

DeepEval's whole pitch is that evaluating an LLM shouldn't require learning a new tool — if your team already writes pytest, you already know how to write a DeepEval test. That framing, plus Apache 2.0 licensing with no...

Promptfoo built its reputation as the eval tool developers actually reach for instead of rolling their own harness — YAML configs, 50-plus provider support, and a red-teaming mode that generates jailbreak and prompt-inje...

Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.