Decagon vs Puzzle vs Sierra AI vs Tractable

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Decagon Enterprise AI customer-support agents Visit Puzzle AI-native general ledger with real-time burn and runway Visit Sierra AI Branded AI agents for customer experience Visit Tractable Computer-vision damage estimates for insurers, from photos alone Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7 / 10 7 / 10 7.2 / 10 6.4 / 10
Capability 8 7 9 7
Value for money 5 7.5 5 6
Ease of use 6 7.5 6 5
ASEAN readiness 5 4.5 5 5
API quality 6 0 4 5
Pricing Enterprise Freemium Enterprise Enterprise
Free tier
Paid from
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users More than 40% of the Fortune 50 as customers; company reported more than $150M ARR as of early 2026
Founded 2023 2023 2014
Maker
Verdict

Decagon builds enterprise-grade autonomous AI customer-support agents that resolve (not just deflect) tickets across chat, email and voice, integrating with internal systems via APIs to take real actions like billing loo...

Puzzle's real pitch isn't automation for its own sake, it's real-time: instead of finding out your burn rate at month-end close, Puzzle updates continuously as transactions land from Stripe, Brex, Mercury, Ramp, and simi...

Sierra builds bespoke, action-taking AI agents for enterprise customer service — resolving issues, processing cancellations, handling upsells — with deep systems integration and strong guardrails. The May 2026 raise ($95...

Tractable reads photos of a wrecked car or a damaged roof and outputs an itemized repair estimate, cutting what used to be a multi-day adjuster visit down to minutes. It's genuinely the market leader in this narrow niche...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.