Cursor vs Sourcegraph Amp
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Cursor
AI-first VS Code fork — agentic, codebase-aware editing
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8.6 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Free tier | Hobby plan — standing free tier (not just a trial), 2,000 completions / 50 slow premium requests per month, no card required | — |
| Paid from | $20/month (Pro); Pro+ $60/month; Ultra $200/month; Teams $40/user/month | — |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 1m+ developers | — |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Maker | SpaceX | — |
| Verdict | Cursor is the most polished AI-first code editor going — a VS Code fork that bakes model-aware autocomplete, multi-file agent edits and chat-with-your-codebase into the core editing loop. Tab completion and Composer are... |
Amp bets on staying at the model frontier rather than accumulating features — it runs Claude Opus, GPT-5.4 and whatever's newest, and Sourcegraph's own team spun it out as an independent company, Amp Inc., in December 20... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.