Consensus vs Elicit vs Undermind
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Consensus
AI search engine that shows what the science actually says
Visit
|
Elicit
AI research assistant for academic literature reviews
Visit
|
Undermind
Deep AI literature search that trades speed for near-total recall
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.3 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Capability | |||
| Value for money | |||
| Ease of use | |||
| ASEAN readiness | |||
| API quality | |||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | Paid |
| Free tier | 20 searches per day with basic features | Basic: unlimited search + 2 automated reports/month; ~125-200M-paper corpus | Free demo available |
| Paid from | Pro $15/mo ($10/mo annual); Deep tier for power users/researchers | Plus $12/mo; Pro $49/mo; Team $79/mo | $9 per summary |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | 500k+ users | 200k+ researchers | 10k+ researchers |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 | 2023 |
| Maker | Eric Olson, Christian Salem | Ought (non-profit) | Ian Fischer |
| Verdict | Consensus answers research questions by pulling from peer-reviewed literature rather than the open web: type a question, get a synthesized answer with citations, a Consensus Meter showing what share of studies actually a... |
Elicit owns the literature-review niche: it searches 138 million papers, pulls methods, sample sizes and findings into structured comparison tables, and links every extraction back to source text, which makes verificatio... |
Undermind, a YC-backed startup from two MIT physics PhDs, runs successive adaptive searches over the scientific literature instead of one-shot keyword retrieval, reading full texts and chasing citation trails to approach... |
| Full review → | Full review → | Full review → |
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.